independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Thieves in the Temple? Is Prince's Estate Plan Being Suppressed?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 06/15/16 4:37am

Eileen

XxAxX said:

RenaRF said:

FlyOnTheWall said: My conjecture (and that's all it is) is that the family is asking for an expedited disposition on the estate. I read elsewhere that George Lopez had made a loan to some number of Prince's known heirs. Prince had apparently been supporting his siblings and half siblings (or at least some of them). Presumably, with him no longer here to parcel out that support, the family is in dire need. Which is why it would make sense for them to request an expedited disposition.

that would seem to be at least partly the case:

http://kstp.com/news/trust-company-prince-estate-case/4163893/

.

Created: 06/08/2016 4:40 PM

A Minnesota judge has authorized the trust company that's overseeing Prince's estate to hire entertainment industry experts to help manage and preserve the deceased superstar's musical legacy.
. . .

Eide wrote that he intends for Bremer Trust "to take all prudent steps" to generate money from Prince's intellectual property, to raise funds for administering the estate and for paying estate taxes. So he says the company needs advice from industry experts to make the necessary business decisions.


XxAxX, How does that make it partly the case? I don't see the connection between Bremer's action that you are noting here, and how it equates to a request being made by the family to speed things up because they need money to live on. ?? I'm not seeing the linkage.

And for the third or fourth time I will note, this is the kicker set of actions that per reports, some members of the family wanted a hand in and review time added to the plan, and Bremer argued against this saying it would slow things down.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 06/15/16 4:52am

XxAxX

avatar

Eileen said:

XxAxX said:

that would seem to be at least partly the case:

http://kstp.com/news/trust-company-prince-estate-case/4163893/

.

Created: 06/08/2016 4:40 PM

A Minnesota judge has authorized the trust company that's overseeing Prince's estate to hire entertainment industry experts to help manage and preserve the deceased superstar's musical legacy.
. . .

Eide wrote that he intends for Bremer Trust "to take all prudent steps" to generate money from Prince's intellectual property, to raise funds for administering the estate and for paying estate taxes. So he says the company needs advice from industry experts to make the necessary business decisions.


XxAxX, How does that make it partly the case? I don't see the connection between Bremer's action that you are noting here, and how it equates to a request being made by the family to speed things up because they need money to live on. ?? I'm not seeing the linkage.

And for the third or fourth time I will note, this is the kicker set of actions that per reports, some members of the family wanted a hand in and review time added to the plan, and Bremer argued against this saying it would slow things down.

Eileen - please don't take this the wrong way - i'm not here to argue with you or anyone else. you are free to read and interpret the court documents and news articles just as i am. whatever interpretation you have, please feel free to share. if you disagree with my insights and opinions - too bad lol


this is not court. we are not at work here. this is a discussion board on a website devoted to prince. again, i don't want to argue/debate. rose

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 06/15/16 4:53am

XxAxX

avatar

here is a link to all court documents filed so far in this case.

http://www.mncourts.gov/InReTheEstateofPrinceRogersNelson.aspx

10-PR-16-46 In re the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, Deceased

[Edited 6/15/16 4:54am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 06/15/16 6:07am

Eileen

XxAxX said:

Eileen - please don't take this the wrong way - i'm not here to argue with you or anyone else. you are free to read and interpret the court documents and news articles just as i am. whatever interpretation you have, please feel free to share. if you disagree with my insights and opinions - too bad lol


this is not court. we are not at work here. this is a discussion board on a website devoted to prince. again, i don't want to argue/debate. rose


Accepted, nothing personal. If I forget your name, which I will at some point, and accidentally attempt to dialogue with one of your future monologues, please feel free to remind me or ignore me, whatever works for you.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 06/15/16 7:00am

XxAxX

avatar

Eileen said:

XxAxX said:

Eileen - please don't take this the wrong way - i'm not here to argue with you or anyone else. you are free to read and interpret the court documents and news articles just as i am. whatever interpretation you have, please feel free to share. if you disagree with my insights and opinions - too bad lol


this is not court. we are not at work here. this is a discussion board on a website devoted to prince. again, i don't want to argue/debate. rose


Accepted, nothing personal. If I forget your name, which I will at some point, and accidentally attempt to dialogue with one of your future monologues, please feel free to remind me or ignore me, whatever works for you.

lol lol lol thank u

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 06/15/16 12:28pm

FlyOnTheWall

XxAxX said:

Eileen said:


XxAxX, How does that make it partly the case? I don't see the connection between Bremer's action that you are noting here, and how it equates to a request being made by the family to speed things up because they need money to live on. ?? I'm not seeing the linkage.

And for the third or fourth time I will note, this is the kicker set of actions that per reports, some members of the family wanted a hand in and review time added to the plan, and Bremer argued against this saying it would slow things down.

Eileen - please don't take this the wrong way - i'm not here to argue with you or anyone else. you are free to read and interpret the court documents and news articles just as i am. whatever interpretation you have, please feel free to share. if you disagree with my insights and opinions - too bad lol


this is not court. we are not at work here. this is a discussion board on a website devoted to prince. again, i don't want to argue/debate. rose

Very interesting point, XxAxX. It almost seems like following and responding to this thread is work for some.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 06/15/16 12:36pm

mailaccount63

XxAxX said:

here is a link to all court documents filed so far in this case.

http://www.mncourts.gov/InReTheEstateofPrinceRogersNelson.aspx

10-PR-16-46 In re the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, Deceased

[Edited 6/15/16 4:54am]


and/or you can check out the sticky: The Estate.

RIP Prince. We will NEVER forget you. Thank you so much.

"Dearly Beloved:
We are gathered here today 2 get through this thing called: 'Life'."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 06/15/16 12:50pm

XxAxX

avatar

FlyOnTheWall said:

XxAxX said:

Eileen - please don't take this the wrong way - i'm not here to argue with you or anyone else. you are free to read and interpret the court documents and news articles just as i am. whatever interpretation you have, please feel free to share. if you disagree with my insights and opinions - too bad lol


this is not court. we are not at work here. this is a discussion board on a website devoted to prince. again, i don't want to argue/debate. rose

Very interesting point, XxAxX. It almost seems like following and responding to this thread is work for some.

at my old law firm we would FOR SURE have had someone monitoring websites and social media in connection with this developing matter. so, i just don't want anyone to take me too seriously here - i'm nothing more than a fan, speculating on prince's death. (which is kind of morbidly gross of me in a way). but, i don't think it rises to the level of arguing over what *might* be going to happen next. rose

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 06/15/16 12:51pm

XxAxX

avatar

mailaccount63 said:

XxAxX said:

here is a link to all court documents filed so far in this case.

http://www.mncourts.gov/InReTheEstateofPrinceRogersNelson.aspx

10-PR-16-46 In re the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, Deceased

[Edited 6/15/16 4:54am]


and/or you can check out the sticky: The Estate.

yes, you did a great job with those links! very informative. i read some of the filings online; the judge will be challenged to quickly resolve this matter, in my sense of things. i really have no idea what will happen next

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 06/19/16 10:07pm

langebleu

avatar

moderator

Pleqase continue dicussion here: http://prince.org/msg/7/426092

ALT+PLS+RTN: Pure as a pane of ice. It's a gift.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 6 <123456
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Thieves in the Temple? Is Prince's Estate Plan Being Suppressed?