independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Tue 10th Dec 2019 6:17am
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Can Trump become a holy Reagan-esque right wing Messiah?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 6 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #150 posted 06/15/19 5:51pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

Ugot2shakesumthin said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

again why make up such things? do you live in such a bubble. do you have such a narrow minded world view that anyone that doesn't agree with you enough they must be fake?

And. Ow you think you’re Trump twisting reality

you falsely accused me of being a phoney... I am just trying to work out why... but based on your reply here... I am not sure it is not something deeper. See I am cool that you do not agree with a few small issues. (you will not like it be we agree on most issues). But if making up stuff makes you feel better well go ahead. I forgive you 4 out of 5.

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #151 posted 06/15/19 5:53pm

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



Ugot2shakesumthin said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:



again why make up such things? do you live in such a bubble. do you have such a narrow minded world view that anyone that doesn't agree with you enough they must be fake?



And. Ow you think you’re Trump twisting reality


you falsely accused me of being a phoney... I am just trying to work out why... but based on your reply here... I am not sure it is not something deeper. See I am cool that you do not agree with a few small issues. (you will not like it be we agree on most issues). But if making up stuff makes you feel better well go ahead. I forgive you 4 out of 5.



Oh gee thanks. I was wondering when I’d finally be forgiven
lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #152 posted 06/15/19 5:54pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

Ugot2shakesumthin said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

you falsely accused me of being a phoney... I am just trying to work out why... but based on your reply here... I am not sure it is not something deeper. See I am cool that you do not agree with a few small issues. (you will not like it be we agree on most issues). But if making up stuff makes you feel better well go ahead. I forgive you 4 out of 5.

Oh gee thanks. I was wondering when I’d finally be forgiven lol

4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #153 posted 06/15/19 5:59pm

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



Ugot2shakesumthin said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:



you falsely accused me of being a phoney... I am just trying to work out why... but based on your reply here... I am not sure it is not something deeper. See I am cool that you do not agree with a few small issues. (you will not like it be we agree on most issues). But if making up stuff makes you feel better well go ahead. I forgive you 4 out of 5.



Oh gee thanks. I was wondering when I’d finally be forgiven lol



4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)



I never knew I was 80% right-wing hate monger
Thanks ...I think
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #154 posted 06/15/19 6:02pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

Ugot2shakesumthin said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)

I never knew I was 80% right-wing hate monger Thanks ...I think

well you are not right wing... and 4 out of 5 is 64% 4.5 is about 81%

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #155 posted 06/15/19 6:07pm

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



Ugot2shakesumthin said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:




4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)



I never knew I was 80% right-wing hate monger Thanks ...I think



well you are not right wing... and 4 out of 5 is 64% 4.5 is about 81%



Oh ok whewwww that’s better. 64% right wing hate monger. Now i feel better.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #156 posted 06/15/19 6:37pm

13cjk13

I fucking HATE T*ump. More than I ever thought possible. I hope he rots in prison.

"If we had had confidence the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #157 posted 06/15/19 7:39pm

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

Ugot2shakesumthin said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:



Ugot2shakesumthin said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:




4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)



I never knew I was 80% right-wing hate monger Thanks ...I think



well you are not right wing... and 4 out of 5 is 64% 4.5 is about 81%



Oh ok whewwww that’s better. 64% right wing hate monger. Now i feel better.


...and ...is that a special right-wing calculator you’re using to get 4/5 =64%?

Perhaps that’s the problem right there?
[Edited 6/16/19 3:57am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #158 posted 06/15/19 9:27pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

I call Trump names because I DO HATE HIM- I believe that he is an immoral and indecent man with no values or scruples.

And it is NOT a fucking game to me

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #159 posted 06/15/19 9:30pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

Ugot2shakesumthin said:

Ugot2shakesumthin said:
Oh ok whewwww that’s better. 64% right wing hate monger. Now i feel better.
...and ...is that a special right-wing calculator you’re using to get 4/5 =60%? Perhaps that’s the problem right there?

It's the same calculator that came up with "the overwhelming majority of America supported Trump"

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #160 posted 06/16/19 1:10am

maplenpg

avatar

jjhunsecker said:

I call Trump names because I DO HATE HIM- I believe that he is an immoral and indecent man with no values or scruples.

And it is NOT a fucking game to me

I agree - I HATE Trump's use of Twitter, which he has used yet again to attack things that are none of his business yet again (the Mayor of London - Guess what? Sadiq Khan's not white - surprise surprise). He seems think running the country (& trying to run the world) is like being on a reality show, and it's not.

EDIT: To add that our Home Secretary Sajid Javid was the only senior cabinet minister not to get an invite to the state banquet put on for Trump. Sajid Javid is non-white and openly critical of Trump.

[Edited 6/16/19 1:14am]

We are all okay, as long as "we" are the ones living on top of the empire of eternal war. - Jaawwnn
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #161 posted 06/16/19 3:53am

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

jjhunsecker said:

I call Trump names because I DO HATE HIM- I believe that he is an immoral and indecent man with no values or scruples.


And it is NOT a fucking game to me



Not only that, he started his campaign by being disrespectful and calling people names. And as he has gone forward, disrespecting people, blatant lying and calling people names has become his standard mode of operation.

He’s truly a sleazeball who has earned all the disrespect that comes his way.
[Edited 6/16/19 4:21am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #162 posted 06/16/19 4:59am

maplenpg

avatar

Ugot2shakesumthin said:

jjhunsecker said:

I call Trump names because I DO HATE HIM- I believe that he is an immoral and indecent man with no values or scruples.

And it is NOT a fucking game to me

Not only that, he started his campaign by being disrespectful and calling people names. And as he has gone forward, disrespecting people, blatant lying and calling people names has become his standard mode of operation. He’s truly a sleazeball who has earned all the disrespect that comes his way. [Edited 6/16/19 4:21am]

yeahthat

We are all okay, as long as "we" are the ones living on top of the empire of eternal war. - Jaawwnn
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #163 posted 06/16/19 5:45am

benni

avatar

maplenpg said:

jjhunsecker said:

I call Trump names because I DO HATE HIM- I believe that he is an immoral and indecent man with no values or scruples.

And it is NOT a fucking game to me

I agree - I HATE Trump's use of Twitter, which he has used yet again to attack things that are none of his business yet again (the Mayor of London - Guess what? Sadiq Khan's not white - surprise surprise). He seems think running the country (& trying to run the world) is like being on a reality show, and it's not.

EDIT: To add that our Home Secretary Sajid Javid was the only senior cabinet minister not to get an invite to the state banquet put on for Trump. Sajid Javid is non-white and openly critical of Trump.

[Edited 6/16/19 1:14am]


He has said more about the knife deaths in London, than he has said about the gun deaths in the USA. There have been only about 30 knife deaths this year in London. There have been 80 gun deaths so far this year in Washington, DC. There were about 135 knife deaths last year in the UK. There were 14,611 gun murders (excludes the number of suicides) in the USA last year. Why are those knife deaths more important than the gun deaths in the USA? The UK is at least trying to do something about it: https://www.theguardian.c...-crackdown USA? Not so much.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #164 posted 06/16/19 6:14am

maplenpg

avatar

benni said:

maplenpg said:

I agree - I HATE Trump's use of Twitter, which he has used yet again to attack things that are none of his business yet again (the Mayor of London - Guess what? Sadiq Khan's not white - surprise surprise). He seems think running the country (& trying to run the world) is like being on a reality show, and it's not.

EDIT: To add that our Home Secretary Sajid Javid was the only senior cabinet minister not to get an invite to the state banquet put on for Trump. Sajid Javid is non-white and openly critical of Trump.

[Edited 6/16/19 1:14am]


He has said more about the knife deaths in London, than he has said about the gun deaths in the USA. There have been only about 30 knife deaths this year in London. There have been 80 gun deaths so far this year in Washington, DC. There were about 135 knife deaths last year in the UK. There were 14,611 gun murders (excludes the number of suicides) in the USA last year. Why are those knife deaths more important than the gun deaths in the USA? The UK is at least trying to do something about it: https://www.theguardian.c...-crackdown USA? Not so much.

Because he doesn't care about knife crime, all he cares about is attacking a non-white person who is openly critical of him.

We are all okay, as long as "we" are the ones living on top of the empire of eternal war. - Jaawwnn
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #165 posted 06/16/19 11:55pm

BombSquad

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

[...] and 4 out of 5 is 64% 4.5 is about 81%

4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)

in fact it is EXACLTY 80%

4 out of 5 is the same as 8 out of 10 is the same as 80 out of 100 is the same as 80%

4.5 out of 5 is the same as 9 out of 10 is the same as 90%





wow

wow


just WOW!




you actually still can surprise us with your unlimited ignorance on basically any given topic LOL

this shit even beats your 1 kilometer is roughly 2 miles or the Islamic Huns terrorizing Spain


dammit, you cannot even grasp simple maths for 10 year old kids! how could anyone even assume you have any chance to understand things like the carbon cycle, socialism socilism or history? LOL


you are without the shadow of a doubt the worst educated and most clueless member this forum has ever seen. pitiful.

but this in some way also has a positive side to it: it makes you THE perfect manipulable right wing tool and mind contolled partisan hack


[Edited 6/17/19 3:00am]

Ideally speaking, the President of the United States and the dumbest person in the country would be two different people. Oh well.... money can't fix stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #166 posted 06/17/19 4:04am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

BombSquad said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

[...] and 4 out of 5 is 64% 4.5 is about 81%

4 out of 5 ... (and that is not the same as 80%)

in fact it is EXACLTY 80%

4 out of 5 is the same as 8 out of 10 is the same as 80 out of 100 is the same as 80%

4.5 out of 5 is the same as 9 out of 10 is the same as 90%





wow

wow


just WOW!




you actually still can surprise us with your unlimited ignorance on basically any given topic LOL

this shit even beats your 1 kilometer is roughly 2 miles or the Islamic Huns terrorizing Spain


dammit, you cannot even grasp simple maths for 10 year old kids! how could anyone even assume you have any chance to understand things like the carbon cycle, socialism socilism or history? LOL


you are without the shadow of a doubt the worst educated and most clueless member this forum has ever seen. pitiful.

but this in some way also has a positive side to it: it makes you THE perfect manipulable right wing tool and mind contolled partisan hack


[Edited 6/17/19 3:00am]

some of us understand more than just linear equations... Have you ever heard of scale?


No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #167 posted 06/17/19 4:35am

BombSquad

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

BombSquad said:

in fact it is EXACLTY 80%

4 out of 5 is the same as 8 out of 10 is the same as 80 out of 100 is the same as 80%

4.5 out of 5 is the same as 9 out of 10 is the same as 90%





wow

wow


just WOW!




you actually still can surprise us with your unlimited ignorance on basically any given topic LOL

this shit even beats your 1 kilometer is roughly 2 miles or the Islamic Huns terrorizing Spain


dammit, you cannot even grasp simple maths for 10 year old kids! how could anyone even assume you have any chance to understand things like the carbon cycle, socialism socilism or history? LOL


you are without the shadow of a doubt the worst educated and most clueless member this forum has ever seen. pitiful.

but this in some way also has a positive side to it: it makes you THE perfect manipulable right wing tool and mind contolled partisan hack


[Edited 6/17/19 3:00am]

some of us understand more than just linear equations... Have you ever heard of scale?


instead of admitting you fucked up you want to try a save? HAHAHA okay clown, that will be fun, I studied maths 4 semsters (until I finally switched to computer/IT)

so let's have a go!


question: what "scale" did ouy use where 4 out of 5 equals 80%?
I want a precise mathematical definition and explanation
supplemental question: how was that "scale" connected (or recognizable) from your post?

and why where you using it instead of a non-linear scale?
and why did you not allow the most logical choice for a "scale" a linear one, since you claimed clearly 4 out of 5 is NOT 80%






that'll be fun! (*) GO!







(*) of course in reality it will just fade out, cause you'll run away like always when busted for outstanding dumbfuckery


DARWIN! LOL



[Edited 6/17/19 4:44am]

Ideally speaking, the President of the United States and the dumbest person in the country would be two different people. Oh well.... money can't fix stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #168 posted 06/17/19 4:45am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

BombSquad said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

some of us understand more than just linear equations... Have you ever heard of scale?


instead of admitting you fucked up you want to try a save? HAHAHA okay clown, that will be fun, I studied maths 4 semsters (until I finally switched to computer/IT)

so let's have a go!


question: what "scale" did ouy use where 4 out of 5 equals 80%?
I want a precise mathematical definition and explanation
supplemental question: how was that "scale" connected (or recognizable) from your post?

and why where you using it instead of a non-linear scale?
and why did you not allow the most logical choice for a "scale" a linear one, since you claimed clearly 4 out of 5 is NOT 80%






that'll be fun! (*) GO!







(*) of course in reality it will just fade out, cause you'll run away like always when busted for outstanding dumbfuckery


DARWIN! LOL



[Edited 6/17/19 4:44am]

X^2*4

the 5 was a typo



4*4 = 16 and 16* 4 = 64

4.5*4.5 = 20.25 * 4 = 81

As you can have more than 100% the limit would be a 5 as 5*5=25*4 =100

[Edited 6/17/19 4:50am]

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #169 posted 06/17/19 4:48am

BombSquad

avatar

FACT: Trump told 68 million more provable lies in two years than alle prior presidents combined in 200+ years


of course I'm using a non-linear scale! Duh! LMFAO

hey, yo, anythign goes!!!





that is just too dumb for words

your biggest FAIL in quite a while

Ideally speaking, the President of the United States and the dumbest person in the country would be two different people. Oh well.... money can't fix stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #170 posted 06/17/19 4:52am

BombSquad

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

X^2*4

the 5 was a typo


oh yes, a typo. suddenly? LOL why did you not tell this before?

okya, I'll take the bait: what was the post supposed to be exactly without the typo?

and what is the exact reason for you to insert a square here?




gosh, this is FUN!!

Ideally speaking, the President of the United States and the dumbest person in the country would be two different people. Oh well.... money can't fix stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #171 posted 06/17/19 4:52am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

BombSquad said:

FACT: Trump told 68 million more provable lies in two years than alle prior presidents combined in 200+ years


of course I'm using a non-linear scale! Duh! LMFAO

hey, yo, anythign goes!!!





that is just too dumb for words

your biggest FAIL in quite a while

so I failed because you did not get it? I said 4 out 5 was not 80% that suggests it was not linier as why else would I have said that?

.

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #172 posted 06/17/19 4:55am

BombSquad

avatar

you claimed 4 out of 5 is NOT 80%

I ask again: why not? why is a linear scale invalid here?

I want a specific scientific mathematical reason for you to pick that scale


[Edited 6/17/19 4:55am]

Ideally speaking, the President of the United States and the dumbest person in the country would be two different people. Oh well.... money can't fix stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #173 posted 06/17/19 4:56am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

BombSquad said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

X^2*4

the 5 was a typo


oh yes, a typo. suddenly? LOL why did you not tell this before?

okya, I'll take the bait: what was the post supposed to be exactly without the typo?

and what is the exact reason for you to insert a square here?




gosh, this is FUN!!

when I posted the formula "(X^2) x 4" I hit the "5" that was the only typo. I am amused that you think I messed up when I did not. Again I can not forgive more than 100...


you jumped the gun and messed up it is okay I forgive you... hummm 2 out of 5....or 16%

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #174 posted 06/17/19 4:59am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

BombSquad said:

you claimed 4 out of 5 is NOT 80%

I ask again: why not? why is a linear scale invalid here?

I want a specific scientific mathematical reason for you to pick that scale


[Edited 6/17/19 4:55am]

it is my scale and it gets harder to advance as you go... like levels in an RPG... or a little like the richter scale... a 2 is not twice as powerful as a 1... get it? or No? I am thinking No...

No one is coming for your abortion: they just want common-sense abortion regulations: background checks, waiting periods, lifetime limits, take a class, and a small tax.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #175 posted 06/17/19 5:00am

BombSquad

avatar

you claimed "4 out of 5 is NOT 80%"


if you do not specify a scale you simply can not make that claim without looking like a complete fool




DARWIN!

[Edited 6/17/19 5:28am]

Ideally speaking, the President of the United States and the dumbest person in the country would be two different people. Oh well.... money can't fix stupid
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #176 posted 06/17/19 7:46am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Right wingers hate math. Activist Mel Gabler said math was evil because math teaches there are no absolutes, if you tell kids there are no absolutes then they will do crime and drugs. True. lol

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #177 posted 06/17/19 11:05am

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



BombSquad said:




OnlyNDaUsa said:





some of us understand more than just linear equations... Have you ever heard of scale?







instead of admitting you fucked up you want to try a save? HAHAHA okay clown, that will be fun, I studied maths 4 semsters (until I finally switched to computer/IT)

so let's have a go!


question: what "scale" did ouy use where 4 out of 5 equals 80%?
I want a precise mathematical definition and explanation
supplemental question: how was that "scale" connected (or recognizable) from your post?


and why where you using it instead of a non-linear scale?
and why did you not allow the most logical choice for a "scale" a linear one, since you claimed clearly 4 out of 5 is NOT 80%






that'll be fun! (*) GO!







(*) of course in reality it will just fade out, cause you'll run away like always when busted for outstanding dumbfuckery


DARWIN! LOL





[Edited 6/17/19 4:44am]






X^2*4




the 5 was a typo



4*4 = 16 and 16* 4 = 64

4.5*4.5 = 20.25 * 4 = 81

As you can have more than 100% the limit would be a 5 as 5*5=25*4 =100


[Edited 6/17/19 4:50am]



The fuck? lol

4 out of 5 = milkshake . Now that I can understand.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #178 posted 06/17/19 11:06am

Ugot2shakesumt
hin

avatar

BombSquad said:

you claimed "4 out of 5 is NOT 80%"


if you do not specify a scale you simply can not make that claim without looking like a complete fool







DARWIN!



[Edited 6/17/19 5:28am]


He said it repeatedly lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #179 posted 06/17/19 11:10am

benni

avatar

FractionDecimalPercent
1/5 0.2 20%
2/5 0.4 40%
3/5 0.6 60%
4/5 0.8 80%

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 6 of 7 <1234567>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Can Trump become a holy Reagan-esque right wing Messiah?