independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > Evidence for a flat earth?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 21 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 08/14/15 7:06am

Funkcreep

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

Funkcreep said:

Yeah they went up...but didnt continue going straight up? why do they always go sideways?



LMFAO, you're awesome.

Do you believe that if a rocketship were to travel to a point in space - be it the moon, or the ISS, or the Hubble - that you just point the craft at that destination, light fires, and go?

Everything from here on out depends on how you answer that question.

"be it the moon"??? of gosh...please don't tell me you still believe in that fake moon landing??? please say it ain't so joe!

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 08/14/15 7:09am

Funkcreep

avatar

JustErin said:

Funkcreep said:

Look again. They are mountains, the lady who took the video obviously would know if she was filming clouds or mountains. Plus I just watched it again....they are mountains seen from over 100 miles away which would be impossible on a global earth.


Seriously, no more than a week ago I was travelling with my son and we were commenting on how much a group of clouds looked exactly like a mountains in the distance.

Also, I looked up the mountains it was supposed to be...they do not match...could not find angle where it did.

There are plenty of pictures showing the lack of curvature. Plus another big evidence to show lack of curviture is lighhouses. Ships from as far as 50 miles (possibly more) out can see lighthouses which would be impossible if there was curvature on the earth. I have a great pic of the mountains in question taken from Anchorage that clearly show the mountains. I didn't take the pic though.

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 08/14/15 7:14am

Funkcreep

avatar

lust said:

Funkcreep said:

You answered my question, but it was the wrong answer. The horizon always stays at eye level. The next time your on a plane, take a look at the horizon. do you have to look down (which is how it should be on a global earth) or does it remain at eye level?

No. It doesn't stay at eye level if you go high enough. What a stupid assertion. Have you ever travelled by sea to another land mass?

No matter how high you go (aside from NASA of course), the horizon stays at eye level. That would be impossible on a global earth.

I've never travelled by sea to another land mass. (See that..i answered your question...see if you can answer this)

If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Heres the question, how come every time such experiments have been conducted, standing water has proven to be perfectly level, why is that???


Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 08/14/15 7:47am

Funkcreep

avatar

lust said:

Why can't the southern cross be seen from the so called "northern hemisphere"? A flat earth would neccessetate the same night sky. No? I'm in New Zealand. When I speak to my mum in London late at night and she says it's sunny outside where she is. How does that work? Or is she in on the conspiracy. Or am I? And New Zealand doesn't even exist. It's pretty simple stuff. You have thought about this stuff before you've brought these concerns here yes?

Lust, You cannot see every star from every point on Earth simultaneously due to the horizon and law of perspective.

If you have a street, a mile long, and theres a row of streep lamps, it will be noticed that from where we stand the lamps gradually decline to the ground, the last one apparently quite on the ground. Take the lamp at the end of the street and walk away from it a hundred yards, and it will appear to be much nearer the ground than when we were close to it; keep on walking away and it will appear to be graduall depressed until it is last seen on the ground and then disappears.

This proves that the depression of the Pole Star can and does take place in relation to a flat surface, simply because we increase our distance from it, the same as from the street lamp. In other words, the further away we get from an object above us, as a star for example, the more it is depressed, and if we go far enough it will sink (or appear to sink) to the horizon and then disappear.

Lust, hopefully that answers you question "Why can't the southern cross be seen from the so called "northern hemisphere"?

[Edited 8/14/15 7:49am]

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 08/14/15 7:54am

JustErin

avatar

This page expains in the most basic way, for those that are basic why the earth is not flat.

But even just the first explanation explains so well:

Aristotle (who made quite a lot of observations about the spherical nature of the Earth) noticed that during lunar eclipses (when the Earth’s orbit places it directly between the Sun and the Moon, creating a shadow in the process), the shadow on the Moon’s surface is round. This shadow is the Earth’s, and it’s a great clue on the spherical shape of the Earth.

Since the earth is rotating (see the “Foucault Pendulum” experiment for a definite proof, if you are doubtful), the consistent oval-shadow it produces in each and every lunar eclipse proves that the earth is not only round but spherical – absolutely, utterly, beyond a shadow of a doubt not flat.



http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/top-10-ways-to-know-the-earth-is-not-flat/

Again, I ask...what is the purpose and motivation in denying that the earth is flat?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 08/14/15 8:13am

Dancelot

avatar

Funkcreep said:

There are plenty of pictures showing the lack of curvature. Plus another big evidence to show lack of curviture is lighhouses. Ships from as far as 50 miles (possibly more) out can see lighthouses which would be impossible if there was curvature on the earth.

depends on how high the lightsource is over the water line

I did a quick calculation with Pythagoras (using the metric system cause I'm used to it)
a lighthouse 100 meter over water will be seen from at least 35 kilometers away
so if you claim 50 miles, then the tower would have to be very high indeed, actually higher than any lighthouse existing


alrigthy, so then if you didn't just pull that nnumber out your ass, can you give a peer reviewed paper for an experiment where a distance of 50 milers has been confirmed? because just "saying stuff" is not good enough for me


but be it 35, 50, 70 or whatever, I have a counter question:

if it is flat, then on a clear day the light must be seen from 100, 300, 500+... miles away too.

do you have observations and confirmed experiments for that? smile

Vanglorious... this is protected by the red, the black, and the green. With a key... sissy!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 08/14/15 8:27am

Funkcreep

avatar

Dancelot said:

Funkcreep said:

There are plenty of pictures showing the lack of curvature. Plus another big evidence to show lack of curviture is lighhouses. Ships from as far as 50 miles (possibly more) out can see lighthouses which would be impossible if there was curvature on the earth.

depends on how high the lightsource is over the water line

I did a quick calculation with Pythagoras (using the metric system cause I'm used to it)
a lighthouse 100 meter over water will be seen from at least 35 kilometers away
so if you claim 50 miles, then the tower would have to be very high indeed, actually higher than any lighthouse existing


alrigthy, so then if you didn't just pull that nnumber out your ass, can you give a peer reviewed paper for an experiment where a distance of 50 milers has been confirmed? because just "saying stuff" is not good enough for me


but be it 35, 50, 70 or whatever, I have a counter question:

if it is flat, then on a clear day the light must be seen from 100, 300, 500+... miles away too.

do you have observations and confirmed experiments for that? smile

The Isle of White lighthouse in England is 180 feet high and can be seen up to 42 miles away, a distance at which modern astronomers say the light should fall 996 feet below line of sight.

The Cape L'Agulhas lighthouse in South Africa is 33 feet high, 238 feet above sea level, and can be seen for over 50 miles. If the world was a globe, this light would fall 1,400 feet below an observer's line of sight!

The lighthouse of Port Said, Egypt, at an elevation of only 60 feet has been seen an astonishing 58 miles away, where according to modern atronomy it should be 2,182 feet below the line of sight!

Another great example is the Norte Dame Antwerp spire standing 403 feet high from the foot of the tower with Strasburg measuring 468 feet above sea level. With the aid of a telescope, ships can be distinguished on the horizon and captains declare they can see the cathedral spire from an amazing 150 miles away. If the earth were a globe, however, at that distance the spire should be an entire mile, 5280 feet below the horizon!

[Edited 8/14/15 8:28am]

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 08/14/15 9:55am

RodeoSchro

Funkcreep said:

RodeoSchro said:



LMFAO, you're awesome.

Do you believe that if a rocketship were to travel to a point in space - be it the moon, or the ISS, or the Hubble - that you just point the craft at that destination, light fires, and go?

Everything from here on out depends on how you answer that question.

"be it the moon"??? of gosh...please don't tell me you still believe in that fake moon landing??? please say it ain't so joe!



LMAO, you're awesome! Of course it happened. You should start another thread about it!

I'm going to rely on my friends that have actually been to outer space and seen the Earth from the International Space Station. They all say Earth is round. So to recap: You have never been outside the USA. My friends have been to outer space. I win.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 08/14/15 10:23am

Funkcreep

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

Funkcreep said:

"be it the moon"??? of gosh...please don't tell me you still believe in that fake moon landing??? please say it ain't so joe!



LMAO, you're awesome! Of course it happened. You should start another thread about it!

I'm going to rely on my friends that have actually been to outer space and seen the Earth from the International Space Station. They all say Earth is round. So to recap: You have never been outside the USA. My friends have been to outer space. I win.

"of course it happend"??? wow! and you have friends who have been to outer space???

They must have figured out how to get past the Van Allen radiation belt because NASA is still working on it.

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 08/14/15 10:33am

damosuzuki

lol

Why do same-sized virtical objects cast shadows of different lengths at the same time of the day if they are different parts of the planet?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 08/14/15 10:42am

RodeoSchro

Funkcreep said:

RodeoSchro said:



LMAO, you're awesome! Of course it happened. You should start another thread about it!

I'm going to rely on my friends that have actually been to outer space and seen the Earth from the International Space Station. They all say Earth is round. So to recap: You have never been outside the USA. My friends have been to outer space. I win.

"of course it happend"??? wow! and you have friends who have been to outer space???

They must have figured out how to get past the Van Allen radiation belt because NASA is still working on it.



Yep! Lots of them! I even know a guy that went to the moon. Shucks, I got a Thanksgiving card emailed to me from the ISS one year. Heck, I've even talked to astronauts on the ISS via cell phone. Figure that one out!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 08/14/15 10:52am

Funkcreep

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

Funkcreep said:

"of course it happend"??? wow! and you have friends who have been to outer space???

They must have figured out how to get past the Van Allen radiation belt because NASA is still working on it.



Yep! Lots of them! I even know a guy that went to the moon. Shucks, I got a Thanksgiving card emailed to me from the ISS one year. Heck, I've even talked to astronauts on the ISS via cell phone. Figure that one out!

Would you please address the video i posted titled "NASA engineer admits they can't get past the Val Allen radiation belts"

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 08/14/15 11:01am

JustErin

avatar

Funkcreep said:

RodeoSchro said:



Yep! Lots of them! I even know a guy that went to the moon. Shucks, I got a Thanksgiving card emailed to me from the ISS one year. Heck, I've even talked to astronauts on the ISS via cell phone. Figure that one out!

Would you please address the video i posted titled "NASA engineer admits they can't get past the Val Allen radiation belts"


Great response to this video:

"He didn't admit anything smile Apollo mission was carried more than 4 decades ago. 4 decades ago risking the safety of human crew was very much acceptable. NASA accepted much greater risks than passing through Van Allen Belt at that time. Today such risk is not acceptable. That is why today they have to solve those challenges instead of putting astronauts at risk like in the 60s. Van Allen Belts are not lethal. They "CAN" harm the craft and the crew. There is a big difference between "can" and "will". Micrometeorites can harm the craft and the crew as well, and they're everywhere. That doesn't mean they will. By your logic ISS can't really exist either as it's traveling through all that space debris and micrometeorites so I guess it's fake as well. Never mind it's flying over your head every day. Damn, people are so under educated these days... Radio telemetry from across the globe (even Russia) tracked the Apollo module to/from the Moon. Would have been very obvious if signal wasn't originating from where NASA said the astronauts were. But a layman like you can't possible understand how radio works, so you'll end up believing crackpot stories told around camp fires. Get yourself educated, for your own sake."

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 08/14/15 11:17am

RodeoSchro

JustErin said:

Funkcreep said:

Would you please address the video i posted titled "NASA engineer admits they can't get past the Val Allen radiation belts"


Great response to this video:

"He didn't admit anything smile Apollo mission was carried more than 4 decades ago. 4 decades ago risking the safety of human crew was very much acceptable. NASA accepted much greater risks than passing through Van Allen Belt at that time. Today such risk is not acceptable. That is why today they have to solve those challenges instead of putting astronauts at risk like in the 60s. Van Allen Belts are not lethal. They "CAN" harm the craft and the crew. There is a big difference between "can" and "will". Micrometeorites can harm the craft and the crew as well, and they're everywhere. That doesn't mean they will. By your logic ISS can't really exist either as it's traveling through all that space debris and micrometeorites so I guess it's fake as well. Never mind it's flying over your head every day. Damn, people are so under educated these days... Radio telemetry from across the globe (even Russia) tracked the Apollo module to/from the Moon. Would have been very obvious if signal wasn't originating from where NASA said the astronauts were. But a layman like you can't possible understand how radio works, so you'll end up believing crackpot stories told around camp fires. Get yourself educated, for your own sake."



Thanks!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 08/14/15 11:21am

Funkcreep

avatar

JustErin said:

Funkcreep said:

Would you please address the video i posted titled "NASA engineer admits they can't get past the Val Allen radiation belts"


Great response to this video:

"He didn't admit anything smile Apollo mission was carried more than 4 decades ago. 4 decades ago risking the safety of human crew was very much acceptable. NASA accepted much greater risks than passing through Van Allen Belt at that time. Today such risk is not acceptable. That is why today they have to solve those challenges instead of putting astronauts at risk like in the 60s. Van Allen Belts are not lethal. They "CAN" harm the craft and the crew. There is a big difference between "can" and "will". Micrometeorites can harm the craft and the crew as well, and they're everywhere. That doesn't mean they will. By your logic ISS can't really exist either as it's traveling through all that space debris and micrometeorites so I guess it's fake as well. Never mind it's flying over your head every day. Damn, people are so under educated these days... Radio telemetry from across the globe (even Russia) tracked the Apollo module to/from the Moon. Would have been very obvious if signal wasn't originating from where NASA said the astronauts were. But a layman like you can't possible understand how radio works, so you'll end up believing crackpot stories told around camp fires. Get yourself educated, for your own sake."

"Van Allen Belts are not lethal"?? LOL ok...if you say so.

The ISS is a fraud, just like the moon landing. Space travel as you've been taught is a fantasy world. NASA put's up fake CGI pictures and that just proves space travel to the masses. You stick to the fake pics that NASA feeds to the sheep and I'll stick with science, experiements performed on earth, etc...

Let me ask you a question?

Where does space actually begin? 10,000 miles up? 1000 miles up? And how does space even exist if it's connected to our atmosphere? That cant possibly be accurate because space for it to exist the way NASA portrays it, would have to be in a vacuum.

I'm afraid to ask if you still think hijackers with box cutters hijacked jets and slammned them in to the trade centers which caused them to collapse? I'm really afraid to ask that if you believe an aluminum jet can not only penetrate a steel building but pop out on the other side......UNDAMAGED! Please tell me you don't buy the offiicial 9/11 story.

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 08/14/15 11:22am

RodeoSchro

I'll be darned. Kelly Smith - the NASA engineer in your video - works right here at the Johnson Space Center. Shouldn't be too hard to find him and ask him if that's what he really meant.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 08/14/15 11:24am

RodeoSchro

Funkcreep said:

JustErin said:


Great response to this video:

"He didn't admit anything smile Apollo mission was carried more than 4 decades ago. 4 decades ago risking the safety of human crew was very much acceptable. NASA accepted much greater risks than passing through Van Allen Belt at that time. Today such risk is not acceptable. That is why today they have to solve those challenges instead of putting astronauts at risk like in the 60s. Van Allen Belts are not lethal. They "CAN" harm the craft and the crew. There is a big difference between "can" and "will". Micrometeorites can harm the craft and the crew as well, and they're everywhere. That doesn't mean they will. By your logic ISS can't really exist either as it's traveling through all that space debris and micrometeorites so I guess it's fake as well. Never mind it's flying over your head every day. Damn, people are so under educated these days... Radio telemetry from across the globe (even Russia) tracked the Apollo module to/from the Moon. Would have been very obvious if signal wasn't originating from where NASA said the astronauts were. But a layman like you can't possible understand how radio works, so you'll end up believing crackpot stories told around camp fires. Get yourself educated, for your own sake."

"Van Allen Belts are not lethal"?? LOL ok...if you say so.

The ISS is a fraud, just like the moon landing. Space travel as you've been taught is a fantasy world. NASA put's up fake CGI pictures and that just proves space travel to the masses. You stick to the fake pics that NASA feeds to the sheep and I'll stick with science, experiements performed on earth, etc...

Let me ask you a question?

Where does space actually begin? 10,000 miles up? 1000 miles up? And how does space even exist if it's connected to our atmosphere? That cant possibly be accurate because space for it to exist the way NASA portrays it, would have to be in a vacuum.

I'm afraid to ask if you still think hijackers with box cutters hijacked jets and slammned them in to the trade centers which caused them to collapse? I'm really afraid to ask that if you believe an aluminum jet can not only penetrate a steel building but pop out on the other side......UNDAMAGED! Please tell me you don't buy the offiicial 9/11 story.



ZOMG do I have some friends in P&R that need to meet you!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 08/14/15 11:25am

JustErin

avatar

Funkcreep said:

JustErin said:


Great response to this video:

"He didn't admit anything smile Apollo mission was carried more than 4 decades ago. 4 decades ago risking the safety of human crew was very much acceptable. NASA accepted much greater risks than passing through Van Allen Belt at that time. Today such risk is not acceptable. That is why today they have to solve those challenges instead of putting astronauts at risk like in the 60s. Van Allen Belts are not lethal. They "CAN" harm the craft and the crew. There is a big difference between "can" and "will". Micrometeorites can harm the craft and the crew as well, and they're everywhere. That doesn't mean they will. By your logic ISS can't really exist either as it's traveling through all that space debris and micrometeorites so I guess it's fake as well. Never mind it's flying over your head every day. Damn, people are so under educated these days... Radio telemetry from across the globe (even Russia) tracked the Apollo module to/from the Moon. Would have been very obvious if signal wasn't originating from where NASA said the astronauts were. But a layman like you can't possible understand how radio works, so you'll end up believing crackpot stories told around camp fires. Get yourself educated, for your own sake."

"Van Allen Belts are not lethal"?? LOL ok...if you say so.

The ISS is a fraud, just like the moon landing. Space travel as you've been taught is a fantasy world. NASA put's up fake CGI pictures and that just proves space travel to the masses. You stick to the fake pics that NASA feeds to the sheep and I'll stick with science, experiements performed on earth, etc...

Let me ask you a question?

Where does space actually begin? 10,000 miles up? 1000 miles up? And how does space even exist if it's connected to our atmosphere? That cant possibly be accurate because space for it to exist the way NASA portrays it, would have to be in a vacuum.

I'm afraid to ask if you still think hijackers with box cutters hijacked jets and slammned them in to the trade centers which caused them to collapse? I'm really afraid to ask that if you believe an aluminum jet can not only penetrate a steel building but pop out on the other side......UNDAMAGED! Please tell me you don't buy the offiicial 9/11 story.


I'm going to ask this again, what is the exact purpose for one to deny that the earth is flat?

What is the purpose for all the faking and fraudulent claims, by basically the entire world?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 08/14/15 11:43am

Funkcreep

avatar

JustErin said:

Funkcreep said:

"Van Allen Belts are not lethal"?? LOL ok...if you say so.

The ISS is a fraud, just like the moon landing. Space travel as you've been taught is a fantasy world. NASA put's up fake CGI pictures and that just proves space travel to the masses. You stick to the fake pics that NASA feeds to the sheep and I'll stick with science, experiements performed on earth, etc...

Let me ask you a question?

Where does space actually begin? 10,000 miles up? 1000 miles up? And how does space even exist if it's connected to our atmosphere? That cant possibly be accurate because space for it to exist the way NASA portrays it, would have to be in a vacuum.

I'm afraid to ask if you still think hijackers with box cutters hijacked jets and slammned them in to the trade centers which caused them to collapse? I'm really afraid to ask that if you believe an aluminum jet can not only penetrate a steel building but pop out on the other side......UNDAMAGED! Please tell me you don't buy the offiicial 9/11 story.


I'm going to ask this again, what is the exact purpose for one to deny that the earth is flat?

What is the purpose for all the faking and fraudulent claims, by basically the entire world?

The ones in power, the elites know that in order to really control the world, the masses need to be controlled, misled, then they can have power over us. Flat Earth, Fed Reserve (fracional reserve banking), World Wars, 9/11, Moon Landing etc..

Flat earth belief - the earth was created by God and we are special with the sun, moon and stars revolving around us! We are the center of the universe.

Global earth belief - the earth was not created by God and we are not special becuase there are bilion and bilions of other planets, galaxies etc... We are NOT the center of the universe, we're just a spec in the galaxy.

Financial...NASA's budget is upwards to 80-90 billion dollars per year.

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 08/14/15 11:58am

JustErin

avatar

Funkcreep said:

JustErin said:


I'm going to ask this again, what is the exact purpose for one to deny that the earth is flat?

What is the purpose for all the faking and fraudulent claims, by basically the entire world?

The ones in power, the elites know that in order to really control the world, the masses need to be controlled, misled, then they can have power over us. Flat Earth, Fed Reserve (fracional reserve banking), World Wars, 9/11, Moon Landing etc..

Flat earth belief - the earth was created by God and we are special with the sun, moon and stars revolving around us! We are the center of the universe.

Global earth belief - the earth was not created by God and we are not special becuase there are bilion and bilions of other planets, galaxies etc... We are NOT the center of the universe, we're just a spec in the galaxy.

Financial...NASA's budget is upwards to 80-90 billion dollars per year.


"Elites" saying the earth is round vs flat somehow asserts more control? Please explain to me how it does?

How does saying we are not the center of the universe assert more control over the population?

Accusations and claims mean nothing without motive and explanation.

So please provide me with exact information on how making these fraudulent claims actually controls the masses, and what the consequences of not making these claims would be.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 08/14/15 12:06pm

NorthC

Uhm... People have known that the earth was round for centuries. It's a myth that people in the Middle Ages thought the world was flat. They didn't. Portugese explorer Fernao de Magelhaes circumnavigated the world in in 1519-1522. (Okay, he died along the way, but his crew made it back to Portugal.) Since then, people like Olivier van Noort, Francis Drake, William Dampier and many others have done the same. Dampier even sailed around the world three times.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 08/14/15 1:55pm

ThisOne

Do u have a map of flat earth?
Art Of.... sour lemon cake lol !!!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 08/14/15 2:37pm

RodeoSchro

ThisOne said:

Do u have a map of flat earth?



I found some pictures!











Check out this thread. It's full of impeccable proof that the Earth is, actually, flat:


http://www.landoverbaptis...hp?t=40617

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 08/14/15 4:19pm

Funkcreep

avatar

Flat earth map (notice the Antartica surrounding the oceans)

ThisOne said:

Do u have a map of flat earth?

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 08/14/15 6:01pm

lust

avatar

So presumably your model requires the sun and stars to be extremely small and extremely close above our surface. Speak more to the specifics of that. How far up are they? How big are they. How does this tiny sun have the energy to continuingly burn and warm us for 4.54 billion years? Ok let's just head that one off right now. How does it have the energy to burn bright for the last 6000 years?

Tell us more.
If the milk turns out to be sour, I aint the kinda pussy to drink it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 08/14/15 6:08pm

lust

avatar

To be fair. At least we probably agree on something.

Those hollow earthers are fucking nuts eh?
If the milk turns out to be sour, I aint the kinda pussy to drink it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 08/14/15 6:55pm

Funkcreep

avatar

lust said:

So presumably your model requires the sun and stars to be extremely small and extremely close above our surface. Speak more to the specifics of that. How far up are they? How big are they. How does this tiny sun have the energy to continuingly burn and warm us for 4.54 billion years? Ok let's just head that one off right now. How does it have the energy to burn bright for the last 6000 years? Tell us more.

Measuring with sextants and calculating with plane trigonometry both the Sun and Moon figure to be only about 32 miles in diameter and approximately 3,000 miles away.


Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 08/14/15 6:57pm

Funkcreep

avatar

lust said:

So presumably your model requires the sun and stars to be extremely small and extremely close above our surface. Speak more to the specifics of that. How far up are they? How big are they. How does this tiny sun have the energy to continuingly burn and warm us for 4.54 billion years? Ok let's just head that one off right now. How does it have the energy to burn bright for the last 6000 years? Tell us more.

Lust: How does it have the energy to burn bright for the last 6000 years?

Me: That's a great question...i'm still researching that one. Amazing, creation by God this whole world is.

Do you remember lying in bed
With your covers pulled up over your head?
Radio playin' so no one can see - The Ramones
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 08/14/15 7:36pm

wouldntulove2l
oveme

I couldn't believe that there are really people out there in 2015 that still buy into this and the I googled it and: http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/cms/

If a man is considered guilty
For what goes on in his mind
Then give me the electric chair
For all my future crimes"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 08/14/15 7:37pm

lust

avatar

Funkcreep said:



lust said:


So presumably your model requires the sun and stars to be extremely small and extremely close above our surface. Speak more to the specifics of that. How far up are they? How big are they. How does this tiny sun have the energy to continuingly burn and warm us for 4.54 billion years? Ok let's just head that one off right now. How does it have the energy to burn bright for the last 6000 years? Tell us more.


Measuring with sextants and calculating with plane trigonometry both the Sun and Moon figure to be only about 32 miles in diameter and approximately 3,000 miles away.







So is the moon a source of light or does it's light merely come from reflected sunlight?
[Edited 8/14/15 19:38pm]
If the milk turns out to be sour, I aint the kinda pussy to drink it!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 21 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > Evidence for a flat earth?